Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 02:59

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
I gave him everything. He said he loved me. Why?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
China's electric cars are cheaper, but is there a deeper cost? - BBC
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you think the number of sissies is on the rise?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Veteran strategist unveils updated gold price forecast - TheStreet
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ground beef sold at national grocery chain might be contaminated with E. coli, USDA warns - AL.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How do you write a letter to your uncle who sent you money for your birthday outfit?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.